Kyle Kang vs Victor Lilov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Kang has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 46.27% of points compared to Lilov's 43.47%.
• When returning second serves, Kang has also been more effective, winning 48.69% of points while Lilov achieves 47.87%.
• First serve return points show minimal difference, with Kang at 29.97% and Lilov at 29.65%.
• Under pressure, Lilov saves 50.45% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Kang's 47.65% save rate.
• Looking at match wins over the last year, Kang is superior with a 70.59% win rate versus Lilov's 55.81%.
• Both players excel on clay, but Kang slightly edges Lilov with a 62% win rate compared to Lilov's 55% on this surface.
• Kang and Lilov have primarily competed at the Futures level, where Kang wins 73.33% of matches against Lilov's 60%.
• In their head-to-head matchup, Kang leads with one victory out of one encounter, having won 2 sets to 1.
• Deciding set scenarios show Kang winning 100% of their past head-to-head deciding set against Lilov.
• Pressure situations favor Kang, who has been victorious in their only tiebreak against Lilov.
• Over the past year, Kang's average opponent rank was better at 357.62 compared to Lilov's 380.72.
• Both players have strong deciding set records, but Lilov slightly edges out with a 67% win rate over the last 12 months.
• Recently, Kang's break point conversion is more efficient at 45.79%, whereas Lilov's is at 34.67%.

Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the second serve performance, Kang has consistently proven to be marginally better than Lilov, reflecting in winning percentage over the last six months.

The return game stats also lean towards Kang, especially against second serves, showcasing a clearer advantage.

Though Lilov shows stronger performance under pressure in saving breakpoints, Kang's overall match-winning rate remains higher, suggesting a competitive edge.

Clay surfaces highlight their similarities, yet Kang maintains a superior record, further reinforcing his advantage in potential match outcomes on such terrains.

Kang prevails in head-to-head statistics, having captured their previous meeting and consistently demonstrating resilience under pressure situations, notably in tiebreaks.

Considering factors such as opponent quality and efficiency in converting breakpoints, Kang appears more dominant.

Although Lilov holds the edge in general deciding set performance, other comparative statistics sufficiently favor Kang.

Taking all elements into account, Kang is likely to emerge the victor in this upcoming tennis match.